I love this "fitness to purpose" line of thinking. Sometimes people see themselves as "not good enough" or even as having some "personation syndrome" (not "impersonation" by the way, as that is not a correct usage).
As a lawyer, I am quite familiar with the statutory warranty of "fitness to purpose" under the Sale of Goods Act, or even more locally, the Consumer Products Warranties Act (Saskatchewan, Canada). I am also hyper-aware of the trends to protect Pharmaceuticals from the monetary consequences of producing vaccines "not fit to purpose" (look up the claims for "safe and effective"). This is arguably a bias side issue.
I love this "fitness to purpose" line of thinking. Sometimes people see themselves as "not good enough" or even as having some "personation syndrome" (not "impersonation" by the way, as that is not a correct usage).
As a lawyer, I am quite familiar with the statutory warranty of "fitness to purpose" under the Sale of Goods Act, or even more locally, the Consumer Products Warranties Act (Saskatchewan, Canada). I am also hyper-aware of the trends to protect Pharmaceuticals from the monetary consequences of producing vaccines "not fit to purpose" (look up the claims for "safe and effective"). This is arguably a bias side issue.